A major new report has criticised the Government for failing to implement a long-term strategy for tackling domestic violence.Continue reading
A major new report has criticised the Government for failing to implement a long-term strategy for tackling domestic violence.Continue reading
The Court of Appeal has rejected a wife’s bid to secure half of her millionaire husband’s wealth, it has been revealed.Continue reading
A Judge this month called for a change to the rules the Child Maintenance Service (previously the Child Support Agency) apply to determine how much maintenance a non-resident parent should pay.Continue reading
A couple engaged in a legal battle to have civil partnerships made available to all – regardless of their sexual orientation – are to take their case to the Supreme Court.Continue reading
Changes to the layout of a divorce form – inviting individuals to name the person their spouse has committed adultery with – could lead to greater conflict, experts have warned.
The latest version of the form, which was unveiled by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) last week, is rather starker than its predecessor.
While the previous version left a space for parties to identify “co-respondents”, there are fears that the less ambiguous wording will mean some people feel obliged to give a third party’s name, which could serve to make divorce proceedings longer or more acrimonious.
Margaret Heathcote, the vice-chairwoman of family law association Resolution, is one of those to have expressed concerns about the change in layout.
“Generally speaking, we don’t name the third party. It increases the conflict from day one,” she said.
“There’s no need. But because the box is there, the indication will be to fill it in.”
The MoJ has argued that the new form is designed to be more user-friendly and noted there was a clear reference to the fact that it was not compulsory to provide the information.
A spokesman said: “It has always been possible for a petitioner to name the person they believe their spouse has committed adultery with on divorce application forms.
“As set out in the previous form, and more clearly in the new form, there is obviously no obligation to do so. This is a relevant part of divorce proceedings.”
A wife has won the right to appeal to the Supreme Court following one of the most contentious divorce rulings of the past 12 months.Continue reading
A MP is considering whether to bring forward legislation to open up civil partnerships to mixed-sex couples.Continue reading
A specialist panel has supported the idea of a new Hague Convention, which would make it easier to enforce family law agreements across different jurisdictions.Continue reading
A debate about just how much detail from family court cases should be placed in the public domain refuses to die down.Continue reading
This week the National Family Mediation (NFM) charity published figures showing that in 2016 over 60 percent of couples ignored the requirement for separating partners to attend a Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting (MIAM) before applying to the Court to settle family disputes.Continue reading